| Construction Rating: |      | | Flight Rating: |      | | Overall Rating: |      |
Contributed by Frank Casey
Brief:
This is the third Mercury Redstone kit produced by Estes. I built the original K-41 when I was younger and there
really isn't any comparison between the two. This newest kit is more like a snap together plastic model kit. There was
not much skill involved in building it other than trying to apply the very shiny peel and stick decals. More on that
later.
Construction:
The instructions are not the standard very easy-to-follow Estes instructions. They were more a series of
pictures with little text.
The build mostly consisted of snapping together the plastic parts. It was not challenging and went quickly.
Finishing:
I painted the rocket components and then applied the decals. I found that I like peel and stick decals even less for
wraps than for other applications. Applying them is pretty much a one shot deal for the most part. Peel and stick wraps
are very unforgiving. I got them on OK but didn't really like the shiny look to the decals on the rocket. The finished
rocket looks much like a shiny plastic toy.
Construction Rating:
2
out of 5
Flight and Recovery:
I started out with a C6-3 engine because the rocket felt very heavy. I'm glad I did because it doesn't fly all that
high.
The specs say it flies to 500 feet but I don't think mine has even cleared 300. Each flight has produced a low
altitude flight with ejection happening at around 150 feet or so.
I've had the tower break off a couple of times but it glues back on easily enough with some plastic model cement.
Flight Rating:
2
out of 5
Summary:
On the plus side, this kit could be considered a good entry rocket for someone new to building model rockets who
wants to start building scale-like kits.
On the negative side, the build wasn't as satisfying as most. Due partly to the fact that building the kit is
comprised of snapping the plastic parts together and then apply my least favorite (peel and stick) decals. Plus there's
no balsa to work with.
Overall Rating:
2
out of 5 Flight Log| Date | Rocket Name | Motor(s) | Altitude | Notes |
|---|
| 2003-04-26 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | C6-3 | - | Model struggled off the pad. C6 is too little oomph for this model. It needs a D13 for better... | | 2003-05-18 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | C6-3 | - | Again, model struggled to get high enough to eject safely. | | 2004-01-17 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | C6-3 | - | Main 'chute never opened. Lost one fin and the lower launch lug. Easily repairable. | | 2004-04-18 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D13-4 | - | Great flight except that the casing was ejected and lost - on its first flight. :-( | | 2004-05-16 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | C6-3 | - | Great flight, but I definately prefer the D13. | | 2004-12-18 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | C6-3 | - | Chutes took a while to come out. Finally deployed about 20' off the ground. | | 2006-02-19 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | C6-3 | - | Just too little oomph for this model. | | 2006-04-02 | George Beever's Estes Mercury Redstone Liberty Bell 7 | C6-3 | - | Great flight | | 2006-04-29 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D13-4 | - | Model wobbled on the way up. Much better flight than with a C6. The 2 parts got tangled up at... | | 2006-05-21 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D13-4 | - | Very high boost! Much better flight than with a C6. | | 2006-10-15 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D13-4 | - | Another model that veered off to the south. Nice high boost and recovery close to the pads. | | 2006-12-16 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D13-4 | - | Model went unstable as it left the rod. Not sure as to the reason why, as it's flown successfully... | | 2007-01-21 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D13-4 | - | Model went unstable at liftoff. Noticed asymetric erosion pattern on nozzle of reload, which... | | 2007-02-24 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D13-4 | - | Another unstable flight. Had problems with all 3 motors in this pack. | | 2007-04-14 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D24-4 | - | Kicked the casing and ripped out the motor mount for good measure. Fortunately, the casing landed... | | 2007-11-17 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D24-4 | - | Great flight, until the capsule got caught in a thermal. Capsule was last seen heading north. ... | | 2009-04-18 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | C6-3 | - | Good flight. | | 2009-06-26 | George Beever's Estes Mercury Redstone Liberty Bell 7 | C6-3 | - | Perfect, perfect, perfect. Demo flight for Rocketry Camp. | | 2009-11-21 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D24-4 | - | Great flight except for the capsule getting tangled up with the booster at ejection. Booster... | | 2010-02-20 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D24-4 | - | No idea what caused the model to go unstable, but it's not the first time it's happened. Only... | | 2010-11-20 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D24-4 | - | Great flight. | | 2011-12-18 | Bob Bernatchez's Estes Mercury Redstone | D13-4 | - | Model took off to the south, with the capsule landing in a tall tree |
Comments: - Post a Comment -
eBay Offers: ESTES 2167 MERCURY ROCKET REDSTONE LIBERTY BELL 7 NEW >>> Product Details >>> Estes Mercury Redstone, Liberty Bell 7, EST 2167 >>> Product Details >>>
What You Can Do
- Link to this Page -
You can link to this page using the following HTML or BB Code.
Text Link in HTML (for web sites)
<a href="http://www.rocketreviews.com/estes-industries-mercury-redstone-liberty-bell-7--by-frank-casey.html">Estes - Mercury Redstone Liberty Bell 7 - Review by Frank Casey</a>
Text Link in BB Code (for forum posts)
[url=http://www.rocketreviews.com/estes-industries-mercury-redstone-liberty-bell-7--by-frank-casey.html]Estes - Mercury Redstone Liberty Bell 7 - Review by Frank Casey[/url]
Select the appropriate above text with your mouse then "right-click" and select "Copy." Then, paste the text into your web site's code or a discussion forum post.
|
D.W. (July 17, 2008)