InFlight Rockets - Nike Smoke
Contributed by John Lee
The Nike Smoke arrived quite quickly. It was well packaged for protection and, upon opening the box, I found a nice looking plastic package with an attractive face card and what looked to be good quality components. I was ready to get started right away but life had other ideas. I didn't want to give it a half effort so I saved it until I could get through the most recent pressures at work and in my family life. All the while, the poor little thing sat on my desk, begging me to come out and play. Construction:
Placing the engine hood did not seem to have caused too much harm so I pressed on with the centering rings. There are two and they differ from each other. The aft one has a notch for the engine hook cut into the inner edge. The forward one has a notch through which to pass the Kevlar® shock cord on the outer edge. Both rings fit perfectly within the main BT and around the motor mount. No sanding was needed. I slipped them both into place at the marks made in the first step and glued them with yellow glue, filleting the forward edges of each. I will come back and fillet the after edges when the glue has a chance to set up. I also took this opportunity to swab the forward end of the mount with glue and insert the thrust ring/motor block. Again, it was a perfect fit and no modification was needed.
Not wanting to spend the rest of August sanding, I thought I would use the belt on my bench sander. After all, I just had to hold the fin straight and let it remove a little bit of material in a wedge shape up to the tape. Therein lies the problem. I held it neither straight nor did I remove a "little" material. I came very close to butchering the first fin beyond repair before it sunk in that this was what we in Texas call a BAD IDEA. Plan B involved using a sanding stick. At least I would be removing so little material that any bias to one side or another would be visible long before it became a problem. I can be such an ignorant optimist at times. On the second stroke, I learned that I had removed way too much material under plan a and shredded the edge of the fin beyond recognition. It seemed to disolve into sawdust and fine chips. LET ME MAKE CLEAR THAT THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE KIT. I messed it up personally. Putting all that effort into messing up the fins gave the original fillets on the motor mount a chance to dry so I flipped it and filleted the other side. When that had set up, I used a timber hitch to fasten a Kevlar® loop around the motor mount and re-filleted above the Kevlar® to lock it into place.
The other reason I am using the stock chute is that my suspicion was confirmed when I opened the parachute kit. It is a Thermal Rider from Hartle Engineering®. I have reason to know that they are different from most plastic chutes in their durability and ease of assembly. I'm still too lazy to like doing this but this chute makes it a much less onerous chore. When the fillets on the motor mount had set up, it was time to insert the mount into the BT. I test fitted it first and found again that the fit was perfect. No sanding was needed. I used a long swab to pur a ring of glue around the circumference and slid the mount in until the end of the motor tube was even with the end of the BT. I then filleted it with glue.
The kit comes with a wrap around marking guide for the fins and launch lug. I cut it out, wrapped it around and found it to be a perfect fit. I proceeded to mark the fin and lug lines and something seemed not quite right. I looked at the instructions again and they clearly indicated that the lug line should be aligned with the engine hook. I had seen that but forgot about it. I untaped and re-did the marks, producing what I like to call the inkblot camo pattern. The lines were extended in a door frame and the fin lines were given another mark 11/16" forward of the end. In stead of doing the lazy man's CA approach to attaching the fins, I used a double glue joint using yellow glue. I applied a bit to the root edge, pressed the fin in place and then immediately removed it. I let it almost dry and then added a touch more glue and pressed it into place. Doing so produced good results and it did not take anywhere as long as I remember it taking.
With that, there was not much left to construction. I tied the elastic on to the Kevlar®
and to the nosecone. I slipped the snap swivel onto the elastic, attached the chute and stuffed it in the BT. I then
put the cone in place and admired it. Not too bad, even after I had wreaked havoc upon it. PROs: good looking kit that can be well executed even by a dunce like me
When I sanded off the filler, I used a fairly aggresive paper, #180, I think. I knew right away that I would be putting another coat on and that one will come off with a finer paper. Let me hasten to add, this is not a reflection on the quality of the balsa. Far from it. The beauty of the NC was readily apparent right from the first. After the first sanding, it was only more so. I resolved at that point to go whole hog and fill the spirals as well. I mixed up another batch of filler, fairly thin this time, and applied it to the NC, fins and to the spirals. The result is a goopy mess and lots of drops on my overalls but I think the rocket is going to look good. The filler had a couple of days to dry and I began sanding again. This time was with 400# and the finish is smooth. I used a large but soft paintbrush to remove all the dust and set it up on my lazy susan for priming.
So I grabbed a 24mm casing and set it up. I then began the priming process with Kilz®. I recently read a suggestion on a TRF thread that when using Kilz®, you should wait at least 24 hours to sand, even though it is dry to the touch in just a few minutes. It also recomended allowing at least that amount of time between lighter sandings to allow the newly exposed "Kilz®" to dry out a bit. Based upon my past experience, that is probably a good idea. I decided to try it on this rocket since I want it to come out perfect. The extended wait to sand the Kilz® paid off. The sanding with #320 went well and examination showed that no more priming would be needed. Thus it was time to paint the white. I gave the rocket an thorough but not too heavy coating of white paint. About an hour later, I gave it another coat. I could see there would be placed that would need sanding but it was looking good so far.
I used Rustoleum® flourecent yellow. I did not like the looks after the first coat, it had a "dayglo" look to it but I kept going. With successive coats, the color got richer and more natural looking.
When the tape came off, it looked good. I was very happy. Now to the decals. The decals are simple. The consist of 2 "United States", 2 cradles and 3 hatch covers. Even so, I managed to mess them up.
I also realized that I had not chosen the orientation of the yellow fin properly. As a result, the launch lugs are visible from a direction I would rather they were not. I pressed on, however and applied the cradles. One of them is a bit out of line even though I could swear that it looked right when I was placing it. By the time I noticed, though, it had already gripped. The last of the decals were the hatch covers on the nose cone. They went on without any problem. Construction Rating: 4 out of 5
My original intent was to try a D12-7 next but I thought better of it based upon the performance with the C. I decided to try a newly made 18mm adapter and loaded a C6-3. If anything, this flight was even better than the last and the drift was correspondingly far. It became a rocket to be picked up when we drove away. Again, there was no damage. PROs: great performerRecovery: I used the stock chute. In the future, I am either going to switch it out for a smaller one or cut a spill hole. In any event, the provided chute protects the rocket well and provides a decent cardiovascular workout. Summary: Overall Rating: 4 out of 5 Flight Log
What You Can Do
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||