bannerbanner
 Apogee Components      Estes Avenger      Space Shuttle Kit      Photon Probe
Reviews >>

Quest - X-15

Manufacturer:Quest
Construction Rating:
Flight Rating:
Overall Rating:

Contributed by

Quest Aerospace X-15

Brief:
Single stage futuristic plane design, one of the more cool looking introductions by Quest.

Construction:
The kit includes:

  • 18mm motor mount assembly with metal hook
  • 1.4" body tube
  • Plastic nose cone/canopy molded in
  • Laser cut balsa fins, strakes, and rudders
  • 1/8" launch lug
  • Kevlar/elastic shock cord
  • 12" plastic chute
  • Waterslide decals

The body tube had some of the deepest, ugliest spirals I've seen and very poor white glassine top layer. After filling the spirals with Elmer's Fill 'n' Finish, I started to sand the tube down. This caused the edges of the tube started to peel up and the surface started to get a roughed up "orange peel" look. The decals on the other hand, were excellent quality and the white comes through very strongly, even on the gloss black surface.

The instructions were fairly well written along with plenty of good illustrations. Overall, the skill level on a 5 scale was in my opinion, accurately listed as a 2. I did find one very glaring error in the instructions though: the tube marking guide has the wrong lines for mounting the fins. There are 4 fin lines which are supposed to be set at 90-degree rotation points. The marking guide has 4 fin lines but spaced as though there were 5 (72-degree rotation points). This is easy to correct: just fold the guide into fourths and mark where the folds are, not where the printed fin lines are.

Quest Aerospace X-15 Motor mount construction is the basic tube/engine block/centering rings/hook found in most kits. Quest is one of those companies that is kind enough to include Kevlar® for the bottom of the shock cord. The Kevlar line is attached to the motor mount.

Fin prep and mounting for this kit is a bit tricky, which is why this rates as a skill level 2. The instructions offer a good tip for ensuring a better bond along with wings and tails getting slight bevels sanded on their roots. Of course, 10 degree and 28 degree bevels are only theoretical targets for most of us, as I certainly am not that precise in my sanding. Still this helps get more of the fin root actually touching the tube come time to bond.

There are a lot of fins to bond with this kit. You start with two strakes that run the length of the body tube. Next comes rudders for the top and bottom. Follow up by attaching wings flush to the strakes, which explains the beveled root. These are not perpendicular to the body tube at this point. Last comes the tails, which are mounted at roughly 45 degree angles to the wing. The alignment is aided by a laser cut balsa piece that rests against the body tube and holds the correct angle. For all of my fins, I tacked them on with CA, then followed up with wood glue fillets. Note: wait on the fillets until everything is tacked on. This is especially important with the strakes, as you don't want fillets to get in the way of the wing and tail bond joints.

The nose cone is then attached to the elastic shock cord and construction is done.

Finishing:
The finishing on this had good and bad news. The good news is that the paint scheme is pretty simple: the whole thing gets gloss black. The bad news is that there's a lot of work involved if you want to eliminate the spirals and balsa grain. I've already griped about the tube spirals. The balsa fins and wings were good quality but because there are so many of them, filling and prepping for paint was a lot of work.

Once I'd prepped the surfaces, including scrubbing the nose cone with dishwashing liquid to remove any oils, I applied two coats of gray primer and sanded between coats with 220 grit paper. I then applied a light coat of gloss black. Once that coat had dried, I lightly sanded with 600 grit wet/dry and then applied another coat of gloss black.

Quest Aerospace X-15 I allowed the paint to cure for a full 4 days, very worried that the decals would not show up or contrast very well against the dark surface. For the most part, the whites and even the yellows are very visible. I was pleased with the results. There were a couple of small red lettering decals that seemed to disappear against the black surface though. Overall, I think the decals make for exceptional detailing and styling for this kit.

Construction Rating: 4 out of 5

Flight:
First flight was with a B6-4 on a windy day. I was worried that with such large wings/fins, this kit might have trouble going up against heavy winds.

The B6-4 was plenty of power for it, but it definitely lost ground to the wind. It held a straight path even though it was pushed back about 10-15 yards in flight. The 4 second delay was a bit late but that may be fine in less windy conditions.

I did not get a chance to move up to a C but will definitely try that on its next flight. It can clearly handle it since the B barely covered 300 feet, nowhere near the spec'd 450'.

Recovery:
The 12" chute worked fine and the elastic/Kevlar lines showed no signs of wear. There was no damage whatsoever to this despite drifting at least 20 yards in the grass after landing.

Flight Rating: 5 out of 5

Summary:
I'm generally not too impressed with the big commercial mass market offerings, but this one is pretty sharp. I especially liked the decals, which are tremendously better than the peel 'n' stick stuff you'll find flanking this kit at the big chain hobby stores.

Overall Rating: 4 out of 5

    Flight Log

    DateRocket NameMotor(s)AltitudeNotes
    2005-05-07Chan Stevens's Quest X-15B6-4- Good flight, but flew back/downwind. 15 MPH gusts a bit too much for these big wing areas.
    2005-06-11Chan Stevens's Quest X-15C6-3- Flight was unstable
    2005-08-06Andy Turits's Quest X-15B6-4- Thrust to about 50 feet and then pinwheeled violently. ejection charge deployed chute on ground....
    2005-08-06Andy Turits's Quest X-15B6-4- Quick lift off, very slight arc to about 300 feet, perfect apogee and deployment of chute. Landed...
    2005-09-18William Beggs's Quest X-15C6-3- Crazy flight. Rocket seemed unstable. Have emailed Quest but did not get a response.
    2005-10-09Chan Stevens's Quest X-15B4-4-
    2005-12-14Donald Besaw's Quest X-15B6-4- Nice first flight, nice straight flight to maybe 300 feet. Considerable hang time and drift on...
    2005-12-20Donald Besaw's Quest X-15B6-4- Very nice flight, nice straight boost. Excellent recovery, minimal drift. No damage.
    2005-12-23Donald Besaw's Quest X-15C6-5- Very nice flight, very straight. Reached maybe 600 feet. Recovered fairly close to pad. No damage.
    2006-02-10Donald Besaw's Quest X-15C6-5- Nice flight, weathercocked quite a bit which made for a late ejection but everything held...
    2006-02-14Donald Besaw's Quest X-15C6-3- Excellent flight, nice straight boost to maybe 500 feet. Excellent recovery, minimal drift. No...
    2006-05-27Donald Besaw's Quest X-15C6-3- Excellent flight, nice straight boost to maybe 600 feet. Moderate to long drift on recovery. No...
    2006-12-15Donald Besaw's Quest X-15B6-4- Nice flight, reached a modest altitude, maybe 300-350 feet. Short drift on recovery. No damage.
    2006-12-30Gerry Williams's Quest X-15C6-5- MAIDEN FLIGHT: Wacky low-thrust corkscrew flight (possible motor thrust MALF), 25-ft high, hit...
    2007-01-04Andy Turits's Quest X-15C6-3- Wow...looked good to about 100 feet and then started looping and swooping...chute ejected fine and...
    2007-03-27Donald Besaw's Quest X-15C6-5- Nice flight, straight boost, shock cord got all wrapped up around the fins but still recovered...
    2007-12-17Donald Besaw's Quest X-15B6-4- Great flight. I really like the tracking smoke in the Quest motors. Ejected late but everything...
    2008-06-28Keith Hamel's Quest X-15D12-5- Good boost but did a full loop underpower. I suspect not enough nose weight.
    2009-06-06 Duane Boldt's Quest X-15B6-4-
    2009-06-06 Duane Boldt's Quest X-15C6-5- Thought it may have been underpowered on the first flight. Definitely stability problem......
    2009-07-11Duane Boldt's Quest X-15C6-5-
    2009-07-11Duane Boldt's Quest X-15C6-5- This model definitely needs nose weight. Once added it flys great on the C6-5 motors.
    2009-07-11 Duane Boldt's Quest X-15C6-5-
    2009-07-11 Duane Boldt's Quest X-15C6-5- Once nose weight added, this is a great flier.
    2009-07-12Duane Boldt's Quest X-15C6-5-
    2009-07-12Duane Boldt's Quest X-15C6-5- Awesome once the 1/2 oz of nose weight was added. That is a very good reason to check EMRR before...
    2009-07-16 Duane Boldt's Quest X-15B6-4- Started of straight and then started flipping.
    2009-07-25 Duane Boldt's Quest X-15C6-5- Great flight!
    2009-10-15Donald Besaw's Quest X-15B6-4- Great flight, moderate drift. No damage.
    2010-01-12Donald Besaw's Quest X-15B6-4- Nice flight of the X-15 on the Quest motor. I love the tracking smoke that these motors produce....
    2011-04-03Luke Wolski's Quest X-15B6-4- Cartwheeled - needs nose weight
    2011-10-02Rich DeAngelis's X-15B6-2100 feet Maiden Voyage of the X-15. Launched at a 15 degree angle into a moderate wind but she didn't...
    2011-11-06Rich DeAngelis's X-15C6-3220 feet First C flight for this rocket. It flew well and a nice recovery. I packed some dog barf in some...
    2011-12-04Rich DeAngelis's X-15C6-3437 feet I had high hopes for this seriously heavy X-15. Previous flights in winds demonstrated it will fly...
    2012-02-05 Rich DeAngelis's X-15B6-2148 feet On this fairly windy and cold day, I could count on this rocket to fight the winds and fly upwards...
    2012-04-01 Rich DeAngelis's X-15C6-5336 feet I was getting very disappointed with the performance of my parachutes, having 2 successes, 2...

    Comments:

    S.W.T. (May 21, 0005)

    Hi, there is nothing 'futuristic' about this plane. The X-15 is one of the x-planes and is a rocketplane that has made record setting flights. Take a look at: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/x15/cover.html and http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/X-15/

    D.Y. (July 7, 2009)

    I'm currently working on this model and I find the BT is of poor quality as compared to other kits I have built in the past. Anyway I decided to add epoxy clay to all the fins and wings--basically all the seams... I filed the clay down after it hardened and then I sanded until the seams are like glass. I find the wet/dry 400 grit works great for this. I also coated the entire model with Elmer's Wood Filler. I know it sounds like a lot of sanding, but I have built other rockets this way and the finish is unreal. The fins when prepped right looks like they are molded to the BT, which is what I want to achieve. I've been using TESTORS #1237 Flat gray primer and #1247 Gloss Black. I'm very happy with the results, but the paint is very expensive--$3.99 to $4.50 for a 3oz can! I know that others use Krylon and different brands but have been reluctant to try it. Some one tipped me off and said that the $1 Wal-Mart brand paint works pretty good? I have some extra BTs I can practice on.

    Rich DeAngelis (August 19, 2011)

    Yes, the X-15 is certianly part of history. My X-15 kit must have been a newer version. I suspect Quest had some serious complaints about the stability of this design, and made some changes: First, the body tube is about 2 or 3 inches longer than the balsa fin strakes supplied. Also included in the kit is a clump of clay, with instructions to use this in the nosecone (although I'll probably glue weights in there instead). Also, (and this is rather odd) a seperate piece of paper that clearly states to only fly this model on a B-impulse motor, which doesn't agree with the instructions or the kit card. But of course after string-stability testing and adjusting the noseweight, I'll be brave enough to use C6's and maybe an A8 if the model ends up light enough. I'm not new at this! I imagine the extra propellent weight of the C-impulse motors puts the CG behind the CP, so to compensate the designers lengthened the body and added a noseweight to make this stable on a B weight motor. I know many of you out there don't bother to balance the models, but I always do.

    Unlike the reviewer's kit, I found my body tube to be quite smooth, and does not appear to need any filling in of the spirals.  One thing I disagree with and changed on my model: The instructions state to place the motor mount clip opposite the launch lug.  I instead prefer the metal clip and launch lug to remain on the same back-side of the rocket to make it easier to attach the ingitor clips without the interference. Call me a rebel.

    Granted, my model isn't finished yet, so take this all with a grain of salt. I'll report back after a string-stability and actual test flights with the various motors and we'll see how she flies. And one other thing: I may be evil by trying to revise history, but I think this model would look nice painted dark blue instead - I have too many black rockets already!

    Rich DeAngelis (September 26, 2011)

    Please note this correction in the above comment. Quest included a slip of paper specifying to only fly this model on an A8-3 motor - NOT the B-impulse motor I stated above. I'll be string testing and flying this "stretched" X-15 this weekend. Stay tuned...

    Rich DeAngelis (October 3, 2011)

    My "stretched" X-15 flew great! (The body tube supplied from Quest was about 3" longer than the models pictured here). Passed string tests without needing any noseweight, and I flew it with a B6-2 in moderately strong winds that should have upset an unstable model.

    - Post a Comment -

    What You Can Do

    - Link to this Page -